Sunday, October 24, 2021

The British Fin de siècle Obsession with National Degeneracy: the Anglo-Boer War, “New Men and Better Britons’”





638 words
 

꧁꧂


Moral
and physical decay was a preoccupation consuming the minds of Victorians in the 
late 19th century. Many Britons harboured nagging doubts that the world’s foremost empire might be in decline? The fear manifested itself in art and literature, especially in Gothic novels such as The Strange Case of Dr Jeckyll and Mr Hyde and Dracula. Contemporary commentators, social campaigners, liberal imperialists and advocates of ”national efficiency” proffered a raft of varied explanations for the alleged condition of society. Blame was attributed to the rising crime rate, insanity, poverty, unemployment,  immigration, radicalism, sexual deviance, feminism, VD, the transformation  away from rural life to the disease-ridden towns and  the very stresses of modern civilisation (labelled “the dark side of progress”) (‘Deviance, disorder and the self’, www7.bbk.ac.uk). 

The Second Boer War, erupting in 1899, did nothing to settle these concerns. Imperial Britain’s early sub-par performance in the conflict against a “rag-tag” army of Afrikaner farmers fed into the rising tide of British fears of the degeneration of its racial stock. The first portends emerged even before the hostilities began – in the recruitment halls of Britain. The early Boer victories required British reinforcements from home leading to a manpower dilemma – the unhealthy British cities and slums churned out recruits from the working class who were “narrow-chested, knock-kneed, wheezing, rickety specimens” of men. At the time of the Boer War  average British soldier was of diminished stature, shorter than that of 1845...40% of those volunteering in Manchester recruitment halls were rejected as unfit for military service. By 1901 the percentage had increased even moreⓐ. 


Once the fighting began the lacklustre efforts of the British soldiers 
struggling to gain the upper hand left their Australian and New Zealand counterparts with a negative impression of the home country’s martial capability. While British soldiery laboured, the Australasian contingents of soldiers conversely equipped themselves well. C
olonial troops from Australia and New Zealand possessed natural ability to shoot and ride, equipping them to perform well in the open war on the veldt...this plus their ‘bushman’ capacity to live off the land, meant that they clearly adapted to the South African conditions better than the British soldiersⓑ.

The Antipodeans soldiers’ take home message from South Africa was that the “old Britons” were in decline, and that they, the “new Britons”, represented the “coming man”. This view fed into earlier established myths – Australia benefitted, it was said, from a climate infinitely better than Britain, a lavish land … making for a vigorous and healthy ‘race'. WK Hancock described the Australian ‘type’ of man as a harmonious blending of all the British types, nourished by a “generous sufficiency of food (good diet) … breathing space (vast countryside) and sunshine”. At the same time British voices were ominously warning of “racial suicide” and the waning of the nation’s “racial energy”, the self-styled “Better Britons” of Australia and New Zealand  were talking up their own supposed “racial vigour”.  

Postscript: as Victorian Britain evolved into Edwardian Britain, the fears of racial deterioration didn’t diminish, birth-rates which were already in decline going back decades had plummeted dramatically since the Victorians. However, by the time of World War I degeneration theory had lost favour, advances in the understanding of genetics and the vogue for psychoanalytic thinking had prompted its obsolescence (‘Degeneration theory’, www.artandpopularculture.com).  



______________________

ⓐ  one contemporary commentator, cricket writer Albert E Knight, thought the remedy for the physical and moral degeneration of Englishmen lay in cricket – advocating for the creation of more playing fields as an antidote to the decline of young working class men, so that they could be the beneficiaries of the ”cricket way of making honest and healthy Englishmen" 


a report conducted in 1904 with the title “Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration” confirmed that Britons were even more physically unfit than the war had suggested

Friday, October 15, 2021

Swanson, Kennedy, Stroheim and the Doomed “Queen Kelly”

476 words

Queen Kelly is one of early Hollywood’s most controversial movies...burdened with misfortune, its story is that of an excruciatingly long drawn-out saga. The 1928 feature was intended as a star vehicle for top silent screen actress Gloria Swanson who had defected from Paramount to go independent. Joe Kennedy Sr, patriarch of the tragedy-soaked Kennedy family of jinked politicians, comes into the film’s story at this juncture. In the late 1920s Kennedy shrewdly acquired a string of small movie studios which he consolidated into RKO (Radio-Keith-Orpheum) in 1928. 


Kennedy’s foray into the movie biz led to a meeting with Swanson and a 
three-year affair between the two. Joe was hoping to launch a successful career as a Hollywood film tycoon and agreed to finance Swanson’s Queen Kelly. Controversial auteur director Erich von Stroheim was brought in to direct, this was the start of everything going pear-shaped. Let loose with a big budget, Stroheim, an autocratic perfectionist by nature, dragged out the filming of what was intended to his personal masterpiece with constant reshoots and delays – amassing enough footage for a five-and-a-half hour epic.

With the movie still not finished and the Austrian-American director having drained more than $800,000 from the budget, Stroheim was sacked. Filming done, this is where the machinations started getting really interesting. Swanson discovered that Kennedy has deceived her, instead of being an investor in the project Joe had loaned Gloria the capital, Swanson therefore was wholly responsible for the loss! To try to recoup her money, Swanson tried to finish the disaster of a movie...after savage editing a sound version was released in Europe in 1932 (Stroheim, holding US rights to the production, vetoed an American release) (‘Erich von Stroheim’s Damned Queen: Queen Kelly’, Michael Koller, Senses of Cinema, August 2007, www.sensesofcinema.com).

🎥 🎥 🎥 


Sunset Boulevard 

American audiences finally got their first glimpse of Queen Kelly in a curious manner some 20 years later. Sunset Boulevard (1950) reunited two of the original forces behind Queen Kelly, Swanson and Stroheim (as actor). The latter talked director Billy Wilder into using an excerpt from Queen Kelly in Sunset Boulevard – in a delicious irony the footage of Swanson, as Norma Desmond a forgotten silent film star, is presented as one her great silent films. The ensuing interest generated led eventually to a belated second release of the 1928 movie in 1957.

In 1985 Kino International brought to the screen a third release of the much maligned and butchered Queen Kelly. This restored version was based on Stroheim’s original script (www.tvguide.com) but of course still incomplete as intended. 


🎞 🎞🎞 🎞🎞 🎞 


timing also contributed to Queen Kelly’s failure, specifically the increasing popularity of ‘’talkie” movies and the recent introduction of the Hays Code which insisted Stroheim make cuts to the raunchy content in the film, which Stroheim characteristically refused

Where in the World is New Philippines?𖤓

  𖤓 Clue: nowhere near the South China Sea 358 words €€€€€€ Most folk know where the Philippines is, or at least they could point out on a...